Gen Z as Digital Catalysts in Transforming Mosque Communication Service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v42i2.12508Keywords:
Generation Z, mosque communication, digital preaching, community serviceAbstract
In the context of rapid digital transformation and shifting patterns of religious engagement among younger generations, effective communication has become a critical challenge for mosque institutions in urban Muslim societies. This study examines the communication gap between mosque administrators and Generation Z in Makassar, exploring the potential of Gen Z as digital catalysts in transforming mosque communication for inclusive community service. The research employs a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires from 300 Gen Z individuals, while qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including mosque administrators, religious leaders, community leaders, and youth figures, to explore their perspectives and communication challenges. The findings reveal that Gen Z heavily relies on visual and interactive digital platforms (Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp) and feels that current mosque communication is unengaging and irrelevant. There is broad acknowledgment of this communication gap from all stakeholders. Key findings indicate Gen Z's willingness to get involved and use their digital skills to manage mosque social media, with a strong desire for creative freedom.
Downloads
References
Aslan, A., & Pong, K. (2023). Understanding the Trend of Digital Da’wah Among Muslim Housewives in Indonesia. Fikroh: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 16, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.37812/fikroh.v16i1.681
Astor, A., Khir-Allah, G., & Martínez-Cuadros, R. (2024). Anonymity and Digital Islamic Authority. Religions, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121507
Bagby, I. , P. P. , & F. B. (2001). The American Mosque 2011: National Potrait of Masque and Leadership in United State.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Binti Roslan, M., Zahari, S., & Ghani, M. (2025). Da’wah on the Social Media: The Youth Engagement in Digital Islamic Content. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX, 1161–1174. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010098
Bolton, R., Parasuraman, A. P., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Komarova, Y., & David, S. (2013). Understanding Gen Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24, 245–267.
Briandana, R., Doktoralina, C., Hassan, S., & Wan. (2020). Da’wah Communication and Social Media: The Interpretation of Millennials in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, VIII, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/543
Cenita, J. A., & Guzman, Z. (2023). Education in the Digital World: From the Lens of Millennial Learners. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 7, 1816–1829. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.132
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. David. (2023). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Dimock, M. (2019, January 19). Defining Generation: Where Milleninals end and Generazion Z begins. Pew Research Centre. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/Where-millennials-end--and-generation-z-begins/
Ellison, C. G., & George, L. K. (1994). Religious Involvement, Social Ties, and Social Support in a Southeastern Community. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386636
Giddens, A. (2013). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. John Wiley & Sons.
Hasan Wahid, S. (2024). Exploring the intersection of Islam and digital technology: A bibliometric analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101085
Ibrahim, A., Rami, A., & Ahmed Olaitan, A. (2025). Spiritual leadership among youth: Fostering sustainable development towards Islamic values. Multidisciplinary Reviews. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025327
Jenkins, H. , P. R. , W. M. , C. K. , & R. A. J. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. The MIT Press. https://hdl.loc.gov/log.gdc/gdcebookspublic.2022667426
Khamis, S. (2024). The Paradoxes of Modern Islamic Discourses and Socio-Religious Transformation in the Digital Age. Religions, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020207
Latepo, I., Suharto, S., & Nurdin, N. (2021). UNDERSTANDING MUSLIM PREACHING STUDENTS’ USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA. 7, 52–66.
Listianti, A., Fitri, A. A., Sobirin, S., & Astuti, E. Z. L. (2024). ADDRESSING INTERGENERATIONAL COLLABORATION CHALLENGES: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN COMMUNITY-BASED MOSQUE MANAGEMENT. Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 5(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.24260/j-md.v5i2.3637
Mahat, M. A., Kedin, N. A., Hamdan, N., & Jismi, M. S. (2022). The Fate of Mosque in Post-pandemic Period: Youth’s Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/14986
Maulana, M., & Ningrum, W. (2023). MOSQUES AND THE PROBLEM OF GENDER BIAS. Marwah Jurnal Perempuan Agama Dan Jender, 22, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v22i2.24558
McPherson, E. (2015). Advocacy Organizations’ Evaluation of Social Media Information for NGO Journalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214540508
Missier, C. (2025). A Qualitative Study of Digital Religious Influence: Perspectives from Christian, Hindu, and Muslim Gen Y and Gen Z in Mumbai, India. Religions, 16, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010073
Murthy, D., & Gross, A. J. (2017). Social media processes in disasters: Implications of emergent technology use. Social Science Research, 63, 356–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.015
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. Basic Books, Inc.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Saxton, G., & Wang, L. (2013). The Social Network Effect. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and Engaging the Next Generation of Students. About Campus, 22(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293
Selwyn, Neil. (2016). Is technology good for education? Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Smith, G. (2022). From dialogue to activism: How to get Generation Z and Millennials to participate in the multifaith movement in Australia. Social Compass, 69(4), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686211065980
Tapscott, D. (2002). Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Twenge, J. M. (2018a). iGen : why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy--and completely unprepared for adulthood: *and what that means for the rest of us. Atria Paperback.
Twenge, J. M. (2018b). iGEN why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less less happy - and completely unprepared for adulthood - and what that means for the rest of us. Atria Books.
Yakut, S., & Oruç, C. (2025). The Effects of Generation Z Youth’s Social Media Use on Their Religious Learning. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Setiawati, Ikhwan As-ad, Ali Halidin, Abdul Wahid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
