Performance Comparison of Sharia Mutual Funds and Conventional Mutual Funds Based on Risk and Return (2017–2020 period) Using the DEA Method

Abstract

Investment managers use mutual funds as a platform to gather money from the
investor community, which is then invested in securities portfolios. The goal of the
study is to compare the performance of sharia mutual funds and conventional mutual
funds in terms of risk and return levels from 2017 to 2020. Microsoft Excel and
software frontier analysis are used in this study to compare performance effectiveness
using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. According to the study's findings,
both conventional and sharia mutual funds had a performance efficiency of 100% in
2017. In 2018, the performance of mutual funds was generally inefficient, but the
performance of conventional mutual funds was more efficient than the performance
efficiency of Islamic mutual funds, with a ratio of 33.90%: 29.60%. In 2019, Islamic
mutual funds and conventional mutual funds both have inefficient scores, but sharia
performance is more efficient than conventional, with a ratio of 80.00%: 13.20%. The
two mutual funds will then have 100% performance efficiency in 2020.