Focus and Scope

Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan contains publications on reviews, thought results, and research on education management that includes curriculum management, graduate management, learning process management, facility and infrastructure management, education management, financing management, assessment management, and management of educators and educational personnel.

Scope of Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan as follows:

1. Curriculum Management includes Curriculum Management in Elementary School, Curriculum Management in Junior High School, Curriculum Management in High School, Content Standard Study, and Curriculum Study.

2. Graduate Management includes Management of Graduates in Elementary School, Graduate Studies in Elementary School, Management of Graduates in Junior High School, Graduate Studies in Junior High School, Management of Graduates in High School, and Graduate Studies in High School.

3. Learning Process Management includes Learning Process Management in elementary school, Learning Process Management in junior high school, Learning Process Management in high school, Classroom Management in elementary school, Classroom Management in junior high school, Classroom Management in high school, Learning Process Study in elementary school, Learning Process Study in junior high school, and Learning Process Study in high school.

4. Management of Facilities and Infrastructure include Management of Facilities and Infrastructure in Elementary School, Management of Facilities and Infrastructure in junior high school, Management of Facilities and Infrastructure in high school, Management of Science Laboratory, Management of Language Laboratory, Management of Computer Laboratory, Management of Teaching Resources, and Library Management.

5. Education Management includes Education Management in Elementary School, Education Management in Junior High School, Education Management in High School, Education Studies in Elementary School, Education Studies in Junior High School, and Education Studies in High School.

6. Financing Management includes Financing Management in Elementary School, Financing Management in Junior High School, Financing Management in High School, Management of Madrasah/School Operational Costs, Assessment of Madrasah/School Operational Costs.

7. Assessment Management includes Assessment Management in Elementary School, Assessment Management in Junior High School, Assessment Management in High School, Learning Assessment, Learning Evaluation Review, and Education Evaluation Review.

8. Management of Educators and Education staff include Management of Educators and Educational Personnel in Elementary School, Management of Educators and Educational Personnel in junior high school, Management of Educators and Educational Personnel in high school, Management of Teacher Resources, Management of Education Personnel, and Study of Educators and Education staff.

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The suitability of the manuscript for the publication of the Journal of Education Management Science is assessed by peer reviewers and editorial boards. All review processes are conducted in a double-blind review. The Editor-in-Chief handles all correspondence with the author and makes a final decision on whether the paper is recommended to be accepted, rejected, or needs to be returned to the author for revision.

Editor in Chief and Editorial Board will evaluate the papers submitted in a prequalification step for the suitability of the further review process. The script will be evaluated by two qualified peer reviewers selected by the Editor-in-Chief. Peer reviewers should review the manuscript and return it with their recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief as soon as possible, usually within 3 weeks. The Editor-in-Chief decides on the receipt or rejection of the paper.

Papers requiring revision will be returned to the author, and the author must return the revised manuscript to the Editor-in-Chief through the OJS Journal of Educational Management Science. The Editor-in-Chief sends a revised script to the Editorial Board to check if the manuscript was revised as suggested by peer reviewers. The Editorial Board may recommend to the Editor-in-Chief that the manuscript should be returned to the author, accepted, or rejected within 1 week. The Editor-in-Chief will send a letter announcing the issue of publication attached with a reprint of the manuscript to the author. 

Publication Frequency

The Journal of Education Management Science is published twice a year, in June and December. Starting from Volume 6 Issue 1 of 2020, the Journal of Education Management Science is published in May and November.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

  

Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.While the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies.
I. Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.
II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.
Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.
February 14, 2002
Budapest, HungaryLeslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Gu don: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists 
Istv n R v: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant 
Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...  

Article Processing Charges (APCs) & Article Submission Charges

Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan is an open-access journal and we are very pleased to inform you (All Authors) that we are free from any Article Submission Charges. Article Publication: 500K (IDR). This journal charges the article publication fee for supporting the cost of wide-open access dissemination of research results, managing the various costs associated with handling and editing of the submitted manuscripts, and the Journal management and publication in general, the authors or the author's institution is requested to pay a publication fee for each article accepted. Readers can read and download any full-text articles for free of charge. But authors may also pay some fees for the Ordered Original Reprint Articles (not reprint issue) with some eligible rates. For details about Original Reprint articles, please contact our team at +628812388031

Publication Ethics

Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan is a peer-reviewed journal to discuss about new findings in basic education especially at primary/elementary schools. This journal is publishing original research articles and case studies focused on basic education. This following statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  The Department of Islamic Education Management at the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten as publisher of Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan takes its duties as guardianship on all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical responsibilities and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenues do not affect or influence editorial decisions. After you have finished reading this Publication Ethics  Statement, please download Letter of Copyright Agreement. Please sign and submit the Ethical Statement as a part of your initial article submission. The Copyright Agreement must be submitted before the article can be published.
Publication decisions
The editor of the Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions.
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest.
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards.
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication.
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgment of Sources.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest.
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works.
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
 
Plagiarism Check
Each articles entry will be carried out the screening process for plagiarism check using Plagiarism Checker X and Grammarly
 
Reference Management

The writing citations and bibliography, Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan using software Mendeley

Copy Editing and Proofreading

Every articles received by Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan will be checked grammar using Grammarly