Keterwakilan Perempuan di Birokrasi: Fenomena Glass Ceilling Pada Kementerian Republik Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/jsga.v11i01.10430Keywords:
Glass Ceilling, Feminism, PositionAbstract
As time progresses, the involvement of women becomes significantly apparent in various aspects of life such as education, healthcare, economy, and politics, as well as being crucial within bureaucracy. Despite the importance of women's involvement in bureaucracy, there still exists gender inequality particularly in occupying certain positions. The phenomenon known as the glass ceiling inhibits the career advancement of female workers. In Indonesia, this glass ceiling phenomenon is further reinforced by the patriarchal culture, making it difficult for women working in government ministries to attain promotions or higher positions. Research conducted using qualitative methods, employing books, journals, articles, and other sources as data, indicates that in Indonesia, there are still several obstacles hindering women from advancing in their careers. These obstacles include a lack of awareness and understanding about the importance of gender equality among leaders within the ministry environment. Data also indicates a very low representation of women in crucial positions within Indonesian ministries. However, there are several ways to address the glass ceiling phenomenon, such as setting examples for society that women can be leaders, empowering female employees, and providing skill training to instill knowledge and confidence for them to become leaders.
Keywords: Glass Ceiling, Feminism, Position
Downloads
References
Ackerman, D. B. (1989). Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum integration In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Adadow, A. (2017). Gender and the Civil Service in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 8(4), 601-620.
Ali, S., & Kelly, M. (2004). Ethics and social research In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (2nd ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik Gender Tematik: Potret Keterwakilan Perempuan di Jabatan Pemerintahan.
Barrie, S., Andrews, J., Dean, L., & Heimanis, I. (2010). Employability: Realising the potential of a university education. In Steve Denton & S. Brown (Eds.), A practical guide to university and college management. New York, NY: Routledge
Baxter, J., & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14(2), 275-294.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Buckingham, England: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University press
Boud, D., & Costley, C. (2007). From project supervision to advising: New conceptions of the practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701241034
Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. (2010). Curriculum construction (4th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Pearson
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Habiburrahim, H. (2018). A review of the department of English language education curriculum development. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v6i1.3529
Handayani, T., & Sugiarti. (2002). Konsep dan Teknik Penelitian Gender. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Press.
Handayani, T., & Sugiarti. (2020). Hambatan Karier Perempuan di Sektor Publik: Studi Kasus di Kementerian X. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(2), 145-160.
Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. (2020). Profil Pemberdayaan Perempuan di Sektor Pemerintahan. Jakarta.
Nugroho, R. (2008). Gender dan Administrasi Publik: Studi Tentang Representasi Keterlibatan Perempuan dalam Birokrasi Pemerintah di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 2(1), 1-26.
Orrell, J., & Higgs, J. (2012). Social and political change: Implications for professional and practice-based university education. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billet, M. Hutchings & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers
Riccucci, N. M., & Saidel, J. R. (1997). The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders: A missing piece in representative democracy. Public Administration Review, 423-430.
Sastroatmodjo, S. (2015). Kendala Budaya dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kesetaraan Gender di Lingkungan Kerja Pemerintahan. Jurnal Studi Gender, 5(2), 112-125.
Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Sage Publications.
Whyte, S. (2011). Learning theory and technology in university foreign language education: The case of French universities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210364783
Wirth, L. (2001). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. International Labour Office.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aisyah, Almirah Ghaisani Putri, Yulia Sri Kanti, Aniqotul Ummah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
