KRITIK MATAN HADIS Studi Komparatif antara al-A‘ẓamī dan G.H.A Juynboll
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/holistic.v2i1.925Keywords:
muqāranah, mu‘āraḍah, common linkAbstract
The traditional methods of criticism to the matn of ḥadîths (i.e. muqâranah and mu‘âraḍah) which are employed by the muḥaddithîn are claimed by M. M. Azami to be more accurate and comprehensive, in comparison to the common link method which is introduced by G. H. A. Juynboll. In principle, both muqâranah and mu‘âraḍah work by comparing a concept contained in a hadîth in question to the concept contained in Alqur’ân, Hadîth Mutawâtir, logic, and so on. Meanwhile, common link as a method only compares the wordings of simmilar ḥadîths in question. When the wordings are fitted, the ḥadîths are regarded as ṣaḥîḥ. In contrary, if the wordings are not compatible, the ḥadîths are then regarded weak.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
