Using Technology to Improve English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Assessment

Authors

  • Witri Nur Ilahi UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Fadilla Oktaviana UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Yayu Heryatun UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Ilzamudin Ilzamudin UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Naf'an Tarihoran UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32678/ell.v4i1.11019

Keywords:

Speaking Abilities, Listening Skills, technology, EFL Evaluation

Abstract

 

Abstract: Technology is now a key component of the assessment process used in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction, helping to increase student performance. A more thorough and precise technique to develop students' speaking and listening abilities is through the use of technology in EFL assessments. This study aims to investigate how much the use of technology in EFL assessments can affect students' speaking and listening skills development. It also seeks to define the benefits and difficulties of applying such technology. The research approach employed was a thorough literature analysis, which included an examination of numerous books, journal articles, and other pertinent materials about the application of technology to the evaluation of speaking and listening abilities in an EFL setting. The purpose of this analysis was to collect empirical data regarding the advantages and disadvantages of using this technology. The findings demonstrate that using technology into EFL assessments can greatly enhance the standard of evaluating students' speaking and listening abilities. Via e-learning apps and platforms, students can receive timely and organized feedback that helps them improve their English communication skills and fix errors. But there are still problems to be solved, like digital skills, technology preparedness, and adjusting to new techniques. The study's conclusion is that using technology into EFL assessments helps students' speaking and listening abilities. Educational institutions may fully utilize the potential of technology to enable more efficient and integrated English language learning by giving teachers the proper training, building the necessary technological infrastructure, and putting the right techniques into practice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, Momen Yaseen M. “AI and Chat GPT in Language Teaching: Enhancing EFL Classroom Support and Transforming Assessment Techniques.” International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v4i4.554.

Barrett, Neil E., and Gi Zen Liu. “Global Trends and Research Aims for English Academic Oral Presentations: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Learning Technology.” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 4, 2016, pp. 1227–71, https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628296.

Creswell, John W. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative ResearchFourth Ed.Pearson: Boston. 2012

Cross, J. “Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice.” ELT Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, 2006, pp. 197–98, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci107.

Crossley, Scott A., and Danielle S. McNamara. “Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction.” Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, 2016, pp. 1–310, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500.

Diaz, M., et al. The Impacts of Asynchronous Video Reflection on Perceived Learner Social Presence. no. June, 2015, p. 5860.

Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies: Learning to teach in the primary school. Queensland University of Technology, Australia, 2013. pp. 71 -89. https://scholars.uow.edu.au/display/publication76376

Feedback, Technology-enabled, and First Year. Technology- Enabled Feedback in the First Year. 2016.

Ferris, Dana. Ferris 2002. 2003, pp. 183–90.

Fryer, Luke, et al. “Bots for Language Learning Now: Current and Future Directions.” Language Learning & Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, 2020, pp. 8–22, http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44719.

Hafeez Alvi, Amatul, et al. “Technology, Pedagogy & Assessment: Challenges of COVID19-Imposed E-Teaching of ESP to Saudi Female PY Students.” Arab World English Journal, no. 1, 2021, pp. 334–53, https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.25.

Hernes, Gudmund. Emerging Trends in ICT and Challenges to Educational Planning. no. October, 2014.

Kamat, Yogiraj, and Siddhesh Nasnodkar. “A Survey on the Barriers and Facilitators to EdTech Adoption in Rural Schools in Developing Countries International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing.” International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing, 2019, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3464-1470.

Pal, Joyojeet, et al. “An Accessibility Infrastructure for the Global South.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 03-06-June-2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909666.

Pashler, Harold, et al. “Learning Styles Concepts and Evidence.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, vol. 9, no. 3, 2008, pp. 105–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x.

Pine-Thomas, Joy Anne. Educator’s Technology Integration Barriers and Student Technology Preparedness as 21st Century Professionals. 2017, p. 221.

Pourhossein Gilakjani, A. Factors contributing to teachers’ use of computer technology in the classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2013, 1(3), 262 -267. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010317

Redecker, Christine, and Øystein Johannessen. “Changing Assessment - Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT.” European Journal of Education, vol. 48, no. 1, 2013, pp. 79–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018.

Rip, Arie. “Technology Assessment.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, no. Version 1, 2015, pp. 125–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85036-9.

Shirmatov, S. T. Revolutionizing Language Learning with Smart Technologies. no. 06, 2024, pp. 1165–79.

Singhal, M. The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(6), 1997. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-Internet.html

Shopova, Tatiana. “Digital Literacy of Students and Its Improvement at the University.” Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 7, no. 2, 2014, pp. 26–32, https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201.

Shoukat, S., et al. “Enhancing Language Proficiency Through TPACK Model and AI Applications A Study on Effective Integration Strategies in English Language Instruction.” Pakistan Languages and …, vol. 8, no. 2, 2024, https://ojs.plhr.org.pk/journal/article/view/877%0Ahttps://ojs.plhr.org.pk/journal/article/download/877/767.

Solanki, D., & Shyamlee1, M. P. Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. 2012International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture IPEDR vol. 33, 2012. ©(2012)IACSIT Press, Singapore. 150 -156.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.CV. Alfabeta: Bandung. 2015.

Yang, Min, and David Carless. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 3, 2013, pp. 285–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-21