Muslim Backwardness and Rejection of The Discipline of Religious Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v15i2.10988Keywords:
Religious Studies, Islamic StudiesAbstract
According to the QS World University Rankings for Theology, Divinity, and
Religious Studies 2024, religious studies in Muslim regions are inadequately developed.
The Muslims' dismissal of religious studies is intricately linked to the underdevelopment
of the field. Nevertheless, the dismissal of religious studies by Muslims is frequently
regarded as commonplace without additional scrutiny. This study aimed to examine the
Muslim aversion to religious studies and propose solutions to address the
underdevelopment of religious studies within the Islamic world. Western religious
scholars have frequently positioned modern European history, particularly secularism,
as the core of their explanation of religion. For them, scientific examinations of religion
must exclude the sacred aspect of religion. Consequently, Muslims perceive that their
interpretation of Islam is limited. The hostility and rejection of religious studies by
Muslims fundamentally signify a repudiation of secularism, which negates the
transcendence of God and dismisses the role of religion in society. The debate on
religious studies has not established a neutral environment for Muslims. The author
contemplates this antagonism to counter the narrative surrounding religious studies.
This study aimed to develop Muslim conflict as a contemporary phenomenon,
integrating religious studies, particularly Islamic studies, into Islam's worldview or
epistemology framework, devoid of any characterization as non-rational or nonscientific.
The underdevelopment of religious studies in Muslim nations is attributed to
a deficiency of experts educated in contemporary academic approaches to religion. The
normative-doctrinal approach has thus far been the predominant method employed by
Muslim scholars in the study of Islam. To address the stagnation of religious studies in
the Islamic world, Muslim scholars must amalgamate the normative-doctrinal approach
with the social sciences methodology.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, Rushain. “Did Premodern Muslims Distinguish the Religious and Secular? The Din Dunya Binary in Medieval Islamis Thought”, Journal of Islamic Studies 31, Issue 2, (2020).
Abdullah, M. Amin Abdullah. “Preliminary Remarks on Philosophy of Islamic Religious Sciences”, Al-Jamiah, No. 6 (1998).
Ahmad, Shahab. What is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princenton: Princenton University Press, 2016.
Alles, Gregory D. Religious Studies: a global view. London: Routledge, 2008.
Al-Malkawi, dkk. ‘Aqidatuna> al-Isla>miyya. Amman: Da>r al-Nafa>’is. 2019.
Aziz, Hayatullah Hilmi dan Imroatul Azizah. “Studi Islam Dengan Pendekatan Interdisipliner: Urgensi dan Aplikasinya”. Jurnal Tafaqquh 11, No. 1, (2023)
Cox, Harvey. The Seculer City: Secularization and Urbanization in Theological Prespective. New York: The Macnillan Company, 1965.
Crone, Patricia & Michael Cook. Hagarism: The Making of Islamic World. London: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. Discourse on Civility and Barbarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
----------------------- . The Ideology of Religious Studies. Newyork: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Goudarzi, Mohsen. “Worship (din), Monotheism (islam), and the Qur’an’s Cultic Decalogue”, Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies Association 8, Issue 1, (2021)
Henley, Alexander. “Islam as a Challenge to the Ideology of Religious Studies: Failures of Religion Studies in the Middle East”. Implict Religion 22, Issuue 3/4, (2019).
Jacques, R. Kevin Jaques. “Belief” dalam Key Themes for the Study of Islam. Jamal J. Elias (ed). Oxford: Oneword Publications, 2010.
Khir, Bustami M. S. “Islamic Studies within Islam: definition, approaches and challenges of modernity”, Journal of Beliefs and Values 28, Issue 3 (2007)
Koenjaraningrat. Kebudayaan, Mentalitet dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1976.
Koren, Judith & Yahuda D. Nevo. “The Origins of the Muslim Descriptions of the Jahili Meccan Sanctuary”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 49, No 1, (1990).
Lewis, Bernard. “Translation From Arabic”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, No. 1, (1980)
Martin, Richard C. Pendekatan terhadap Islam dalam Studi Agama, terj. Zakiyuddin Baidhawy. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press, 2010.
Minhaji, Akh. Kontroversi Orientalisme Dalam Studi Islam (Makna, Latar Belakang, Teori, dan Metodologi). Yogyakarta: Bening Pustaka, 2020.
Mun’im, Sirry. Kontroversi Islam Awal: Antara Mazhab Tradisionalis dan Revisionis. Bandung: Mizan, 2013.
QS World University Rangkings, 2020, “Theology, Divinity, and Religious Studies,” https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rangkings/university-subject-rangkings/2020/theology-divinity-religious-studies.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity, Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982.
Senay, Bulent. The Study of Religion, the History of Religions and Islamic Studies in Turkey. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.
Teo, Hsu-Ming. “Orientalism: An Overview”, Australian Humanities Review, Issue 54, (2013).
Thahir, Lukman S. Studi Islam Interdisipliner: Aplikasi pendekatan Filsafat, Sosiologi, dan Sejarah, Yogyakarta: Qirtas, 2003.
Waardenburg, Jacques. “Observations on the Scholarly Study of Religions as Pursued in Some Muslim Country”, Numen 45, Issue 3, (1998).
--------------------------. Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-07-07 (2)
- 2025-01-23 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yarsa Arnanda Yarsa Arnanda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
