Prevention of Registration of Interfaith Marriages Through Sema Number 2 of 2023

Authors

  • Irfan Fahmi Faculty of Law, Pamulang University, Indonesia
  • Wiwin W. Windiantina Faculty of Law, Pamulang University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37035/ajh.v20i1.11035

Keywords:

Interfaith Marriage, SEMA No. 2 of 2023, Supreme Court, Courts, Human Rights

Abstract

Interfaith marriage in Indonesia is still controversial even though Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage explicitly states that marriage must be carried out by the laws of each religion and belief. In practice, cases of interfaith marriage still often occur in the community. Meanwhile, human rights and pluralism activists argue that everyone has the right to form a family, including through interfaith marriage, so the state should not prohibit it. This controversy was reignited when several District Courts granted applications to register interfaith marriages in 2022-2023. In response, the Supreme Court (MA) issued Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 which essentially prohibits courts throughout Indonesia from granting registration of interfaith marriages. This policy has been appreciated by conservative religious circles, but regretted by human rights activists. They believe that the SEMA has the potential to violate the freedom of religion and family guaranteed by the Constitution. This study aims to analyze SEMA No.2/2023 in managing requests for registration of interfaith marriages The study aims to offer insights into the Supreme Court's policy and the challenges encountered by courts, providing constructive suggestions for future interfaith marriage policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Rozali, and Syamsir. Perkembangan Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Keberadaan Peradilan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Jambi: Ghalia Indonesia, 2001.

Fadli Fatmawati Rahmat, Muhammad. “Reformulasi Zero Burning Policy Pembukaan Lahan Di Indonesia.” Lesgislasi Indonesia 13, no. 1 (2016): 85–96.

Fahrur Safi’i, Muhammad. “Viral Pernikahan Pasangan Beda Agama, Ini 5 Potretnya Saat Pemberkatan Di Gereja.” Hot Liputan6.com, 2022. https://www.liputan6.com/hot/read/4906691/viral-pernikahan-pasangan-%0Abeda-agama-ini-5-potretnya-saat-pemberkatan-di-gereja.

Fatoni, Siti Nur, and Iu Rusliana. “Pernikahan Beda Agama Menurut Tokoh Lintas Agama Di Kota Bandung.” Varia Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 95–114.

Febri, Nabilla Putri, Renny Supriyatni, and Hazar Kusmayanti. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penetapan Pengadilan Tentang Pengabulan Permohonan Perkawinan Beda Agama.” COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat2 3, no. 3 (23AD): 1167–78.

Foresty, Cindy Silvy. “Problem Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia: Studi UU No 1 Tahun 1974 Serta UU No 39 Tahun 1999 Dan Hukum Islam.” Yudisia 7, no. 1 (2016): 17–24.

Gonadi, Aurora Vania Crisdi, and Gunawan Djajaputra. “Analisis Perspektif Pro Kontra Masyarakat Terhadap Penerapan Sema No. 2 Tahun 2023.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2974–88.

Bignami, Francesca., G Washington, David T Zaring, and E Elgar. “Introduction. A New Field: Comparative Law and Regulation,” 2020.

Jambunanda, Ahmad Jamaludin. “Transformation of Classical Law to Contemporary in Islamic-Based Marriage Law to Respond to Legal Developments in Indonesia.” Al Ahkam 19, no. 2 (December 2023): 152–72. doi:10.37035/AJH.V19I2.9551.

Jambunanda, Ahmad Jamaludin, Efa Laela Fakhriah, Renny Supriyatni, and Anita Afriana. “Marriage Law in Religious Court: Regulation and Decision on Marital Property in Sustainable Legal Development.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 10 (October 2023): e1759. doi:10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1759.

Shehata, Asmaa. Women’s Rights in Islam: A Critique of Nawal El Saadawi’s Writing. Women’s Rights in Islam: A Critique of Nawal El Saadawi’s Writing. De Gruyter, 2023. doi:10.1515/9783111105314.

Handayani, Febri, and Lysa Angrayni. “Implementasi Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Menurut Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia.” Riau Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 44.

Harris, YP Sibuea. “Penegakan Hukum Pengaturan Minuman Beralkohol.” Negara Hukum 7, no. 1 (2016): 127–43.

Kamil Ardiansyah, Mohammad. “Pembaruan Hukum Oleh Mahkamah Agung Dalam Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 2 (2020): 361–84.

Kurniawan, M. Beni, Dinora Refiasari, and Sri Ayu Ramadhani. “Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Terkait Legislasi Nikah Beda Agama.” Jurnal Yudisial 16, no. 3 (2023): 342–60.

Lubis, Fauziah. “Profesi Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Atas Transaksi Keuangan Yang Mencurigakan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Jupiis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 10, no. 2 (2018): 210.

Manullang, Fernando M. Legisme, Legalitas Dan Kepastian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia, 2016.

Marla Pitaloka, Diah, Benny Djaja, and Maman Sudirman. “LARANGAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA MENURUT MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM SEMA NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2023.” Yustitia 18, no. 1 (2024): 57–63.

Munawaroh, Nafiatul. “Apa Itu SEMA Dan Bagaimana Kedudukannya Dalam Hukum?” Hukum Online, 2024.

Munte, Herdi, and Christo Sumurung Tua Sagala. “Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 183–92.

Mustaqimah, Nurul. “FENOMENA KOMUNIKASI DALAM PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA DI KOTA PEKANBARU.” Jom FISIP 2 (2015): 1–10.

Pohan, A. M. “Relevansi Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Politik Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 25, no. 1 (2018).

Prabowo S.H, Imam. “Paradigma Peraturan Mahkamah Agung: Modern Legal Positivism Theory, Teori Hukum Progresif Dan Urgensi Kodifikasinya.” Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama, n.d. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/paradigma-peraturan-mahkamah-agung-modern-legal-positivism-theory-teori-hukum-progresif-dan-urgensi-kodifikasinya-oleh-imam-prabowo-s-h-19-10.

Ridwan. Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2014.

Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Riski, Petrus. “Aktivis Keberagaman Sesalkan Keluarnya Surat Edaran MA Tentang Pernikahan Beda Agama.” VOA Indonesia, 2023. www.voaindonesia.com/a/aktivis-keberagaman-sesalkan-keluarnya-surat-edaran-ma-tentang-pernikahan-beda-agama/7190583.html.

Rita Kumalasanti, Susana. “MA Larang Pengadilan Lakukan Penetapan Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Kompas, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2023/07/19/ma-pengadilan-dilarang-lakukan-penetapan-perkawinan-beda-agama.

Romli, Muhammad, Nurul Huda, and Aspandi Aspandi. “Pencatatan Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia.” Al- ’Adalah Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (2022): 377–405.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Fahmi, I., & Windiantina, W. W. (2024). Prevention of Registration of Interfaith Marriages Through Sema Number 2 of 2023. Al Ahkam, 20(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.37035/ajh.v20i1.11035